What is the expected behavior of queries run against the user_ltv_no_minors view by users not in the auditing group?

The expected behavior of queries run against the user_ltv_no_minors view by users not in the auditing group is that records where age is less than 18 will be excluded from the results. This design is likely implemented to ensure compliance with legal or ethical standards regarding data privacy and protection, particularly in relation to minors.

In this context, the view is likely created to filter out any individuals who are under the age of 18, thus ensuring that data relating to minors is not accessible to users outside of a designated group with auditing permission. By excluding these records, the integrity and compliance of the data being handled are maintained, reflecting an approach that prioritizes responsible data management.

In terms of the other options, returning all records with null values for age wouldn't effectively enforce the criteria necessary for excluding underage records. While returning all columns without filtering may seem straightforward, it does not adhere to the requirement for age-related filtering. Lastly, returning only records with age greater than 21 is overly restrictive and would not typically represent the behavior expected for a view designed to exclude individuals under 18 rather than establishing a threshold of 21. Therefore, the option indicating that records with an age less than 18 will be excluded is consistent with validation practices and standard operations